Comments on: Wikipedia Remains Go-To Site For Online News http://www.attentionmax.com/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news Max Kalehoff On Marketing, Media and Being A Dad Sun, 20 May 2012 22:44:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: maxkalehoff http://www.attentionmax.com/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news#comment-482 maxkalehoff Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:24:55 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/07/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news.php#comment-482 ragesoss: to quote the data from the actual story: "Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has added about 20 million unique monthly visitors in the past year, making it the top online news and information destination, according to Nielsen//NetRatings. In May, Wikipedia had 46.8 million unique visitors, up 72 percent from June 2006, NetRatings said. Wikipedia also has finished on top of the news and information category every month this year -- ranking ahead of Landmark Communications' Weather Channel site by an increasing margin -- topping out with a disparity of about 10 million visitors in May." There was no press release that I'm aware of. - Max ragesoss: to quote the data from the actual story:

“Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has added about 20 million unique monthly visitors in the past year, making it the top online news and information destination, according to Nielsen//NetRatings. In May, Wikipedia had 46.8 million unique visitors, up 72 percent from June 2006, NetRatings said. Wikipedia also has finished on top of the news and information category every month this year — ranking ahead of Landmark Communications’ Weather Channel site by an increasing margin — topping out with a disparity of about 10 million visitors in May.”

There was no press release that I’m aware of.
- Max

]]> By: maxkalehoff http://www.attentionmax.com/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news#comment-6511 maxkalehoff Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:24:00 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/07/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news.php#comment-6511 ragesoss: to quote the data from the actual story: "Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has added about 20 million unique monthly visitors in the past year, making it the top online news and information destination, according to Nielsen//NetRatings. In May, Wikipedia had 46.8 million unique visitors, up 72 percent from June 2006, NetRatings said. Wikipedia also has finished on top of the news and information category every month this year -- ranking ahead of Landmark Communications' Weather Channel site by an increasing margin -- topping out with a disparity of about 10 million visitors in May." There was no press release that I'm aware of. - Max ragesoss: to quote the data from the actual story:

“Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has added about 20 million unique monthly visitors in the past year, making it the top online news and information destination, according to Nielsen//NetRatings. In May, Wikipedia had 46.8 million unique visitors, up 72 percent from June 2006, NetRatings said. Wikipedia also has finished on top of the news and information category every month this year — ranking ahead of Landmark Communications’ Weather Channel site by an increasing margin — topping out with a disparity of about 10 million visitors in May.”

There was no press release that I’m aware of.
- Max

]]> By: ragesoss http://www.attentionmax.com/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news#comment-481 ragesoss Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:41:35 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/07/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news.php#comment-481 I was very interested to read that Reuters story, but I haven't been able to track down any of the actual data that it's based on. Is that piece basically a press release promoting the newly merged Nielsen/NetRatings, or has fuller data been released somewhere? I'd like to know what all gets included and excluded from "news and information" sites. That's not a typical grouping, and doesn't appear in the older reports that are available on the Neilen website. I was very interested to read that Reuters story, but I haven’t been able to track down any of the actual data that it’s based on. Is that piece basically a press release promoting the newly merged Nielsen/NetRatings, or has fuller data been released somewhere? I’d like to know what all gets included and excluded from “news and information” sites. That’s not a typical grouping, and doesn’t appear in the older reports that are available on the Neilen website.

]]> By: ragesoss http://www.attentionmax.com/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news#comment-6512 ragesoss Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:41:00 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/07/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news.php#comment-6512 I was very interested to read that Reuters story, but I haven't been able to track down any of the actual data that it's based on. Is that piece basically a press release promoting the newly merged Nielsen/NetRatings, or has fuller data been released somewhere? I'd like to know what all gets included and excluded from "news and information" sites. That's not a typical grouping, and doesn't appear in the older reports that are available on the Neilen website. I was very interested to read that Reuters story, but I haven’t been able to track down any of the actual data that it’s based on. Is that piece basically a press release promoting the newly merged Nielsen/NetRatings, or has fuller data been released somewhere? I’d like to know what all gets included and excluded from “news and information” sites. That’s not a typical grouping, and doesn’t appear in the older reports that are available on the Neilen website.

]]> By: Web 2.0: The Human Network http://www.attentionmax.com/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news#comment-489 Web 2.0: The Human Network Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/07/wikipedia_remains_go-to_site_for_online_news.php#comment-489 <!--%kramer-pre%--> che sono gli stessi utenti a pubblicare le informazioni, le storia possono essere pubblicate in tempo reale e questo ha permesso a Wikipedia di trasformarsi in un luogo e fonte d'informazione. Basta fare l'esempio della vicenda di Virginia Tech e il lancio dell'iPhone di Apple, Wikipedia si è trasformato in una fonte aggiornata in tempo reale di news. Anche i reporter ormai lo tengono sotto stretto controllo mentre le storie si<!--%kramer-post%--> che sono gli stessi utenti a pubblicare le informazioni, le storia possono essere pubblicate in tempo reale e questo ha permesso a Wikipedia di trasformarsi in un luogo e fonte d’informazione. Basta fare l’esempio della vicenda di Virginia Tech e il lancio dell’iPhone di Apple, Wikipedia si è trasformato in una fonte aggiornata in tempo reale di news. Anche i reporter ormai lo tengono sotto stretto controllo mentre le storie si

]]>