<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Is Lexical Deviation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation</link>
	<description>Max Kalehoff On Marketing, Media and Being A Dad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation#comment-3484</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Landscape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/12/social_media_is_lexical_deviation.php#comment-3484</guid>
		<description>Well I don&#039;t know about you but I don&#039;t think the Social Media Landscape is changing.... I think it&#039;s growing. What about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t know about you but I don&#8217;t think the Social Media Landscape is changing&#8230;. I think it&#8217;s growing. What about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation#comment-6567</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Landscape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/12/social_media_is_lexical_deviation.php#comment-6567</guid>
		<description>Well I don&#039;t know about you but I don&#039;t think the Social Media Landscape is changing.... I think it&#039;s growing. What about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t know about you but I don&#8217;t think the Social Media Landscape is changing&#8230;. I think it&#8217;s growing. What about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theopapada</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>theopapada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/12/social_media_is_lexical_deviation.php#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Contemporary discussions around social media tend to define social media, in contradistinction to traditional media. Does that mean that traditional media i.e. pre-Internet media are unsocial? I think that every communications medium is social in so far it achieves its essential role, that is, to successfully mediate communication between two people. Then it is by definition social. Unsocial media are broken media. 

The most oft quoted distinction between social and traditional media has been the direction of communication. Social media are two-way while traditional media are one-way. But communication does not have to be two-way to be communication. That is why we speak of one-way communication; because it involves the successful communication of one personâ€™s message to another. But then pre-Internet media are also social. Then why is everybody talking about â€˜Social Mediaâ€™? What is new about them? Visit my blog post at http://agoraplace.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-social-role-of-the-internet-part-i-the-origins-of-web-20-and-social-media/ that deals with question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary discussions around social media tend to define social media, in contradistinction to traditional media. Does that mean that traditional media i.e. pre-Internet media are unsocial? I think that every communications medium is social in so far it achieves its essential role, that is, to successfully mediate communication between two people. Then it is by definition social. Unsocial media are broken media. </p>
<p>The most oft quoted distinction between social and traditional media has been the direction of communication. Social media are two-way while traditional media are one-way. But communication does not have to be two-way to be communication. That is why we speak of one-way communication; because it involves the successful communication of one personâ€™s message to another. But then pre-Internet media are also social. Then why is everybody talking about â€˜Social Mediaâ€™? What is new about them? Visit my blog post at <a href="http://agoraplace.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-social-role-of-the-internet-part-i-the-origins-of-web-20-and-social-media/" rel="nofollow">http://agoraplace.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-social-role-of-the-internet-part-i-the-origins-of-web-20-and-social-media/</a> that deals with question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theopapada</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator>theopapada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/12/social_media_is_lexical_deviation.php#comment-6566</guid>
		<description>Contemporary discussions around social media tend to define social media, in contradistinction to traditional media. Does that mean that traditional media i.e. pre-Internet media are unsocial? I think that every communications medium is social in so far it achieves its essential role, that is, to successfully mediate communication between two people. Then it is by definition social. Unsocial media are broken media. 

The most oft quoted distinction between social and traditional media has been the direction of communication. Social media are two-way while traditional media are one-way. But communication does not have to be two-way to be communication. That is why we speak of one-way communication; because it involves the successful communication of one personâ€™s message to another. But then pre-Internet media are also social. Then why is everybody talking about â€˜Social Mediaâ€™? What is new about them? Visit my blog post at http://agoraplace.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-social-role-of-the-internet-part-i-the-origins-of-web-20-and-social-media/ that deals with question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary discussions around social media tend to define social media, in contradistinction to traditional media. Does that mean that traditional media i.e. pre-Internet media are unsocial? I think that every communications medium is social in so far it achieves its essential role, that is, to successfully mediate communication between two people. Then it is by definition social. Unsocial media are broken media. </p>
<p>The most oft quoted distinction between social and traditional media has been the direction of communication. Social media are two-way while traditional media are one-way. But communication does not have to be two-way to be communication. That is why we speak of one-way communication; because it involves the successful communication of one personâ€™s message to another. But then pre-Internet media are also social. Then why is everybody talking about â€˜Social Mediaâ€™? What is new about them? Visit my blog post at <a href="http://agoraplace.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-social-role-of-the-internet-part-i-the-origins-of-web-20-and-social-media/" rel="nofollow">http://agoraplace.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-social-role-of-the-internet-part-i-the-origins-of-web-20-and-social-media/</a> that deals with question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Social Media Research</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_is_lexical_deviation#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Social Media Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/12/social_media_is_lexical_deviation.php#comment-928</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Maxwrites moreabout his ping pong game of definitional problems with the term &#039;Social Media&#039;. I&#039;m not a friend of Wordpress&#039; comment mechanism (especially when it doesn&#039;t seem to work) so I&#039;m following up here. What bugs me about the debate is the lack of simplicity&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Maxwrites moreabout his ping pong game of definitional problems with the term &#8216;Social Media&#8217;. I&#8217;m not a friend of WordPress&#8217; comment mechanism (especially when it doesn&#8217;t seem to work) so I&#8217;m following up here. What bugs me about the debate is the lack of simplicity<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via attentionmax.attentionmax.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.attentionmax.com @ 2012-02-09 16:07:52 -->
