Coincidentally, it was the Toyota customer service experience posts that got me involved in the Toyota engine oil sludge matter. Customer service should absolutely be at the “center of attention.”

Respectfully, I ask that you please acknowledge those Toyota and Lexus owners who have signed a petition (legitimate CGM) I started one full year after the Customer Support Program for Engine Oil Gelation (April 4, 2002) was initiated. These owners are currently reaching out for a truly satisfactory customer service experience. They have put their faith in Toyota.

Is someone at Toyota Motor Sales, Inc. really listening to this growing group of Toyota vehicle owners? Or, are their pleas falling on deaf ears…away from public scrutiny? I believe that the answers to these questions need to be openly, transparently, and publicly debated.

I thank Bruce Ertmann at Toyota in advance for rising to meet the challenge presented by this public Toyota owner petition. Perhaps this will be a public test case to help define a positive customer service experience?

Charlene Blake
cblake@erols.com
Toyota Owners Unite for Resolution
http://www.petitiononline.com/TMC2003/petition.html.

Coincidentally, it was the Toyota customer service experience posts that got me involved in the Toyota engine oil sludge matter. Customer service should absolutely be at the “center of attention.”

Respectfully, I ask that you please acknowledge those Toyota and Lexus owners who have signed a petition (legitimate CGM) I started one full year after the Customer Support Program for Engine Oil Gelation (April 4, 2002) was initiated. These owners are currently reaching out for a truly satisfactory customer service experience. They have put their faith in Toyota.

Is someone at Toyota Motor Sales, Inc. really listening to this growing group of Toyota vehicle owners? Or, are their pleas falling on deaf ears…away from public scrutiny? I believe that the answers to these questions need to be openly, transparently, and publicly debated.

I thank Bruce Ertmann at Toyota in advance for rising to meet the challenge presented by this public Toyota owner petition. Perhaps this will be a public test case to help define a positive customer service experience?

Charlene Blake
cblake@erols.com
Toyota Owners Unite for Resolution
http://www.petitiononline.com/TMC2003/petition.html.

And as more and more consumers start to vote a second time by virtue of their increasing awareness and fondness for that creative electronic space shaped by them . . . well, companies will find that if they have not taken the time and given thought to how they define the customer experience for their own customers, they can rest assured that customers/consumers will define it for them, often in excruciatingly painful detail for all the world to take in.

I favor the term “customer experience”, because it speaks to more of the 360 of customer service–like the three stages you define in your post. It also is better for companies to think of (and define) the broader concept of the overall customer experience, because it forces them to consider not only the physical components (a beautiful, high quality luxury car) but also those that drive the emotional response to the ownership experience (how does it make me feel to drive this car?; what is the quality of the relationship with the dealership?).

And BTW, if a company–long entrenched in building the finest widgets known to mankind and womankind–is struggling with pulling out the emotional parts of the widget customer experience, its widget management need only drop in to one of the many popular widget consumer enthusiast sites on the net or do a quick You Tube search to see what its customers are doing with their widgets . . . and widget management will get a pretty good idea of the emotional components of the widget ownership experience and whether its hot or cold, green or red.

Not sure how that would look in your tagline, but it does encompass the whole of customer service and then some.

And as more and more consumers start to vote a second time by virtue of their increasing awareness and fondness for that creative electronic space shaped by them . . . well, companies will find that if they have not taken the time and given thought to how they define the customer experience for their own customers, they can rest assured that customers/consumers will define it for them, often in excruciatingly painful detail for all the world to take in.

I favor the term “customer experience”, because it speaks to more of the 360 of customer service–like the three stages you define in your post. It also is better for companies to think of (and define) the broader concept of the overall customer experience, because it forces them to consider not only the physical components (a beautiful, high quality luxury car) but also those that drive the emotional response to the ownership experience (how does it make me feel to drive this car?; what is the quality of the relationship with the dealership?).

And BTW, if a company–long entrenched in building the finest widgets known to mankind and womankind–is struggling with pulling out the emotional parts of the widget customer experience, its widget management need only drop in to one of the many popular widget consumer enthusiast sites on the net or do a quick You Tube search to see what its customers are doing with their widgets . . . and widget management will get a pretty good idea of the emotional components of the widget ownership experience and whether its hot or cold, green or red.

Not sure how that would look in your tagline, but it does encompass the whole of customer service and then some.