<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Ad Salesmen Must Sell More ROI, Not Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions</link>
	<description>Max Kalehoff On Marketing, Media and Being A Dad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KLDY123k</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>KLDY123k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/01/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions.php#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>

Are you dreaming of having a coast dress of your own?
Do you want to wearing the coast wedding dresses when getting
married? It’s your time, now. The coast dresses of the coast stores sale hot.
The coast dresses coast dress sale on a discount. There are
cost maxi dress, maxi dress, coast
wedding dress, and so on. All of them of good quality and elegant style. You
can dresses by coast. You can show your fashion attitude. So ,just go
and be who you are. The coast uk
will give you what you want. No sale tax and free shipping.


http://www.coast-dress.org
 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you dreaming of having a coast dress of your own?<br />
Do you want to wearing the coast wedding dresses when getting<br />
married? It’s your time, now. The coast dresses of the coast stores sale hot.<br />
The coast dresses coast dress sale on a discount. There are<br />
cost maxi dress, maxi dress, coast<br />
wedding dress, and so on. All of them of good quality and elegant style. You<br />
can dresses by coast. You can show your fashion attitude. So ,just go<br />
and be who you are. The coast uk<br />
will give you what you want. No sale tax and free shipping.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coast-dress.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.coast-dress.org</a><br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kalehoff</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/01/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions.php#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Hi Stu. I actually think that the smaller and alternative sites will force ROI more than the big sites (even thought the biggers sites may have an advantage in doing so). The alternative guys under the radar will be much more motivated to prove their value. If they don&#039;t have cookie-cutter impressions to sell, then they&#039;re going to have to come up with something else. And the only thing that will fit the bill will be ROI. I think a key question is on valuing those niche audiences. Certainly, niche sites should not be value on an impression model equal to a mass-reach general portal, for example. It gets into the engagement debate, of defining how qualitatively different impressions impact outcome. But again, it will need to be justified by the ROI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stu. I actually think that the smaller and alternative sites will force ROI more than the big sites (even thought the biggers sites may have an advantage in doing so). The alternative guys under the radar will be much more motivated to prove their value. If they don&#8217;t have cookie-cutter impressions to sell, then they&#8217;re going to have to come up with something else. And the only thing that will fit the bill will be ROI. I think a key question is on valuing those niche audiences. Certainly, niche sites should not be value on an impression model equal to a mass-reach general portal, for example. It gets into the engagement debate, of defining how qualitatively different impressions impact outcome. But again, it will need to be justified by the ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kalehoff</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions#comment-6499</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/01/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions.php#comment-6499</guid>
		<description>Hi Stu. I actually think that the smaller and alternative sites will force ROI more than the big sites (even thought the biggers sites may have an advantage in doing so). The alternative guys under the radar will be much more motivated to prove their value. If they don&#039;t have cookie-cutter impressions to sell, then they&#039;re going to have to come up with something else. And the only thing that will fit the bill will be ROI. I think a key question is on valuing those niche audiences. Certainly, niche sites should not be value on an impression model equal to a mass-reach general portal, for example. It gets into the engagement debate, of defining how qualitatively different impressions impact outcome. But again, it will need to be justified by the ROI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stu. I actually think that the smaller and alternative sites will force ROI more than the big sites (even thought the biggers sites may have an advantage in doing so). The alternative guys under the radar will be much more motivated to prove their value. If they don&#8217;t have cookie-cutter impressions to sell, then they&#8217;re going to have to come up with something else. And the only thing that will fit the bill will be ROI. I think a key question is on valuing those niche audiences. Certainly, niche sites should not be value on an impression model equal to a mass-reach general portal, for example. It gets into the engagement debate, of defining how qualitatively different impressions impact outcome. But again, it will need to be justified by the ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/01/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions.php#comment-406</guid>
		<description>agree with your overall point about emphasizing and  not losing site that roi is a strategic advantage for the online medium. what will happen to smaller sites, in this world? do sites have to get a fairly big audience, to place these trends at their back?

the roi emphasis seems to favor larger publishers and networks, who have the scale to demonstrate the roi within their properties and produce the movements required to impact signficant sized groups or brands, which doesn&#039;t seem to add many chips to the monetization of sites that serve niche audiences, but with light traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree with your overall point about emphasizing and  not losing site that roi is a strategic advantage for the online medium. what will happen to smaller sites, in this world? do sites have to get a fairly big audience, to place these trends at their back?</p>
<p>the roi emphasis seems to favor larger publishers and networks, who have the scale to demonstrate the roi within their properties and produce the movements required to impact signficant sized groups or brands, which doesn&#8217;t seem to add many chips to the monetization of sites that serve niche audiences, but with light traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions#comment-6498</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/01/brand_ad_salesmen_must_sell_more_roi_not_impressions.php#comment-6498</guid>
		<description>agree with your overall point about emphasizing and  not losing site that roi is a strategic advantage for the online medium. what will happen to smaller sites, in this world? do sites have to get a fairly big audience, to place these trends at their back?

the roi emphasis seems to favor larger publishers and networks, who have the scale to demonstrate the roi within their properties and produce the movements required to impact signficant sized groups or brands, which doesn&#039;t seem to add many chips to the monetization of sites that serve niche audiences, but with light traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree with your overall point about emphasizing and  not losing site that roi is a strategic advantage for the online medium. what will happen to smaller sites, in this world? do sites have to get a fairly big audience, to place these trends at their back?</p>
<p>the roi emphasis seems to favor larger publishers and networks, who have the scale to demonstrate the roi within their properties and produce the movements required to impact signficant sized groups or brands, which doesn&#8217;t seem to add many chips to the monetization of sites that serve niche audiences, but with light traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via attentionmax.attentionmax.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.attentionmax.com @ 2012-05-22 23:59:10 -->
