Comments on: Love The iPhone But… http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_the_iphone_but.php Max Kalehoff On Marketing, Startups & Parenting Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:38:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Daniel M. Clark http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_the_iphone_but.php#comment-5832 Daniel M. Clark Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:53:44 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=2494#comment-5832 Exactly... I think the whole population of Albuquerque would just about fit in one borough of New York ;) Exactly… I think the whole population of Albuquerque would just about fit in one borough of New York ;)

]]> By: maxkalehoff http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_the_iphone_but.php#comment-5831 maxkalehoff Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:41:14 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=2494#comment-5831 You probably have a less trafficked metro area, which is easier for<br>ATT to handle. My experience is mostly with people in NYC, LA and San<br>Francisco. You probably have a less trafficked metro area, which is easier for
ATT to handle. My experience is mostly with people in NYC, LA and San
Francisco.

]]> By: Daniel M. Clark http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_the_iphone_but.php#comment-5830 Daniel M. Clark Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:06:34 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=2494#comment-5830 I have to disagree, at least, where I am (Albuquerque). I've had the 3GS since early July and haven't had a call drop yet. Haven't had any complaints about the quality - in fact, the first thing I did was call family in Houston and Tampa and ask how I sounded. Everyone said it sounded fine.<br><br>This is not to say that AT$T is great and everything is always perfect anywhere in the country - clearly, iPhone owners in other areas have been having problems (and I'm sure some owners here in town have had issues, too).<br><br>I'm just sayin', for all the complaints out there, valid or not, there are some of us that are happy with both the device and the service that we're getting... so far. I have to disagree, at least, where I am (Albuquerque). I've had the 3GS since early July and haven't had a call drop yet. Haven't had any complaints about the quality – in fact, the first thing I did was call family in Houston and Tampa and ask how I sounded. Everyone said it sounded fine.

This is not to say that AT$T is great and everything is always perfect anywhere in the country – clearly, iPhone owners in other areas have been having problems (and I'm sure some owners here in town have had issues, too).

I'm just sayin', for all the complaints out there, valid or not, there are some of us that are happy with both the device and the service that we're getting… so far.

]]> By: maxkalehoff http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_the_iphone_but.php#comment-5836 maxkalehoff Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:36:02 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=2494#comment-5836 Thanks. I'll stick with my trusty blackberry...which is archaic, but works<br>pretty good for what I need it to. Thanks. I'll stick with my trusty blackberry…which is archaic, but works
pretty good for what I need it to.

]]> By: theskyewire http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/09/love_the_iphone_but.php#comment-5835 theskyewire Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:31:04 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=2494#comment-5835 perhaps the best way to answer that would be to list my top uses for the iphone:<br><br>1. news/browser/online apps/youtube (40%)<br>2. phone/text (35%)<br>3. ipod (10%)<br>4. calendar (10%)<br>5. camera (5%)<br> <br>So, for me it would probably not be worth it. The ipod touch would be really handy for ical, ipod, and gaming, but besides that I would stick with a nano, which has video-- the touch does not (for now). perhaps the best way to answer that would be to list my top uses for the iphone:

1. news/browser/online apps/youtube (40%)
2. phone/text (35%)
3. ipod (10%)
4. calendar (10%)
5. camera (5%)

So, for me it would probably not be worth it. The ipod touch would be really handy for ical, ipod, and gaming, but besides that I would stick with a nano, which has video– the touch does not (for now).

]]>