http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/10/the_problem_with_full_disclosure_is_that_its_not.php I'm Max Kalehoff & I Write About Marketing, Startups & Parenting Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/10/the_problem_with_full_disclosure_is_that_its_not.php#comment-4799 What Is Transparency? | AttentionMax Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:16:59 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1708#comment-4799 [...] has problems similar to its cousin, full disclosure, which was born in the halls of the SEC. It was intended as a regulatory guarantee that a [...] [...] has problems similar to its cousin, full disclosure, which was born in the halls of the SEC. It was intended as a regulatory guarantee that a [...]

]]> http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/10/the_problem_with_full_disclosure_is_that_its_not.php#comment-5955 maxkalehoff Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:43:29 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1708#comment-5955 Kate, there's a large, much-needed body of research on the lexicon and<br>persuasive techniques of the research industry! We should start a running<br>list of instances and create sort of a lay person's guide to reading between<br>the lines and deciphering agenda, ambiguity, misinterpretation and<br>falsehoods. Carl Bialik <<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/</a>> at the <a href="http://WSJ.com" rel="nofollow">WSJ.com</a><br>writes a column series dedicated to demystifying research and statistics,<br>but I don't believe he's ever tackled this most basic issue of semantics. Kate, there's a large, much-needed body of research on the lexicon and
persuasive techniques of the research industry! We should start a running
list of instances and create sort of a lay person's guide to reading between
the lines and deciphering agenda, ambiguity, misinterpretation and
falsehoods. Carl Bialik <http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/> at the WSJ.com
writes a column series dedicated to demystifying research and statistics,
but I don't believe he's ever tackled this most basic issue of semantics.

]]> http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/10/the_problem_with_full_disclosure_is_that_its_not.php#comment-5954 kate Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:23:53 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1708#comment-5954 reminds me of research showing that use of negations (no, not, never) is a sign of inhibition and constraint... reminds me of research showing that use of negations (no, not, never) is a sign of inhibition and constraint…

]]> http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/10/the_problem_with_full_disclosure_is_that_its_not.php#comment-4578 maxkalehoff Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:43:29 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1708#comment-4578 Kate, there's a large, much-needed body of research on the lexicon and<br>persuasive techniques of the research industry! We should start a running<br>list of instances and create sort of a lay person's guide to reading between<br>the lines and deciphering agenda, ambiguity, misinterpretation and<br>falsehoods. Carl Bialik <<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/">http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/</a>> at the <a href="http://WSJ.com">WSJ.com</a><br>writes a column series dedicated to demystifying research and statistics,<br>but I don't believe he's ever tackled this most basic issue of semantics. Kate, there's a large, much-needed body of research on the lexicon and
persuasive techniques of the research industry! We should start a running
list of instances and create sort of a lay person's guide to reading between
the lines and deciphering agenda, ambiguity, misinterpretation and
falsehoods. Carl Bialik <http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/> at the WSJ.com
writes a column series dedicated to demystifying research and statistics,
but I don't believe he's ever tackled this most basic issue of semantics.

]]> http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/10/the_problem_with_full_disclosure_is_that_its_not.php#comment-4577 kate Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:23:53 +0000 http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1708#comment-4577 reminds me of research showing that use of negations (no, not, never) is a sign of inhibition and constraint... reminds me of research showing that use of negations (no, not, never) is a sign of inhibition and constraint…

]]>