I think this extends beyond performance. That criterion makes a decision more objective and defensible (despite most people being employed at will), but even high performers need to be terminated sometimes.
I came across the idea of “emotional contagion” earlier this week – people who propagate negative emotional contagion should be terminated sooner rather than later as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_contagion
Originally posted as a comment by Peter Kim on AttentionMax using Disqus.
{ 4 comments }
I don't really know what employee termination means and I don't think I like the sound of it. “Even high performers need to be terminated sometimes?” – I don't think I share the same thinking, I am actually on the opposite side.
http://www.davisfest.com/peace-of-mind-and-busi...
Gerry,
“Termination” is an ugly word. It's a life-less word that creates barriers
between businesses, managers, employees and customers. You're right, we
should get rid of it. Thanks for calling that out!
I don't really know what employee termination means and I don't think I like the sound of it. “Even high performers need to be terminated sometimes?” – I don't think I share the same thinking, I am actually on the opposite side.
http://www.davisfest.com/peace-of-mind-and-busi...
Gerry,
“Termination” is an ugly word. It's a life-less word that creates barriers
between businesses, managers, employees and customers. You're right, we
should get rid of it. Thanks for calling that out!
Comments on this entry are closed.