<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Make Conferences Great</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php</link>
	<description>Max Kalehoff On Marketing, Media &#38; The Edge...Plus Bonus Insights On Start-Up Culture &#38; Raising Kids.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:13:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1480#comment-3964</guid>
		<description>Amber, Thanks for your note. Rubber chicken should have been at the top of&lt;br&gt;my list.&lt;br&gt;Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber, Thanks for your note. Rubber chicken should have been at the top of<br />my list.<br />Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Naslund</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php#comment-3963</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Naslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1480#comment-3963</guid>
		<description>Freaking beautiful.  Seriously, I&#039;ve gotten myself so amped up about many a conference, only to be brain damaged by said sandpaper poultry and mind numbing, scripted and canned powerpoint presentations. I go to a conference to be smarter, to meet other smart people (hopefully smarter than me), and nothing deflates me more quickly than realizing I&#039;ve been duped. (Ok, maybe not deliberately buuuuutt...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m especially YAY about #6 and #7. There are so many smart people out there and so few speaking slots. What say we relive a bit of a discussion forum and let the ideas emerge? I mean, hey. It works for Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freaking beautiful.  Seriously, I&#39;ve gotten myself so amped up about many a conference, only to be brain damaged by said sandpaper poultry and mind numbing, scripted and canned powerpoint presentations. I go to a conference to be smarter, to meet other smart people (hopefully smarter than me), and nothing deflates me more quickly than realizing I&#39;ve been duped. (Ok, maybe not deliberately buuuuutt&#8230;)</p>
<p>I&#39;m especially YAY about #6 and #7. There are so many smart people out there and so few speaking slots. What say we relive a bit of a discussion forum and let the ideas emerge? I mean, hey. It works for Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1480#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>TO&#039;B,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment. There is a school of thought called the&lt;br&gt;&quot;unconference&quot;.  I like the idea, but too many of those have had too little&lt;br&gt;structure. I think a great way to cultivate more meaningful conferences is&lt;br&gt;to remove the commercial aspect. Why do you need to pay thousands of dollars&lt;br&gt;to bring people together in a substandard venue? More on that later.&lt;br&gt;Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO&#39;B,<br />Thanks for your comment. There is a school of thought called the<br />&#8220;unconference&#8221;.  I like the idea, but too many of those have had too little<br />structure. I think a great way to cultivate more meaningful conferences is<br />to remove the commercial aspect. Why do you need to pay thousands of dollars<br />to bring people together in a substandard venue? More on that later.<br />Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomob</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>tomob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1480#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>Hi Max:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting post - I am relatively new to the Web 2.0/social media conference circuit - and I am already tired of some of the stories.  There are lots of smart people out there - and conference producers need to think long and hard about moving to Conference 2.0.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conference 1.0 is having people (either smart in the field OR those representing gigantic global corporations) stand up at a podium and hammer us into our seats with powerpoint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conference 2.0 requires audience participation and involvement, and cracks open the podium to get some new ideas and speakers up there - it doesn&#039;t all have to be industry luminaries and pay to play does it?  I think the WOMMA-U conference did something interesting with the WOM in Action program down in Miami.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://preview.tinyurl.com/545ved&quot;&gt;http://preview.tinyurl.com/545ved&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards - TO&#039;B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Max:</p>
<p>Interesting post &#8211; I am relatively new to the Web 2.0/social media conference circuit &#8211; and I am already tired of some of the stories.  There are lots of smart people out there &#8211; and conference producers need to think long and hard about moving to Conference 2.0.</p>
<p>Conference 1.0 is having people (either smart in the field OR those representing gigantic global corporations) stand up at a podium and hammer us into our seats with powerpoint.</p>
<p>Conference 2.0 requires audience participation and involvement, and cracks open the podium to get some new ideas and speakers up there &#8211; it doesn&#39;t all have to be industry luminaries and pay to play does it?  I think the WOMMA-U conference did something interesting with the WOM in Action program down in Miami.</p>
<p><a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/545ved">http://preview.tinyurl.com/545ved</a></p>
<p>Regards &#8211; TO&#39;B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/05/how_to_make_conferences_great.php#comment-3960</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attentionmax.com/?p=1480#comment-3960</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Smoke! And I hope look forward to seeing more about Wine 2.0!&lt;br&gt;Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Smoke! And I hope look forward to seeing more about Wine 2.0!<br />Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
