AttentionMax

  • Home
  • Participate
  • Twitter
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Subscribe via RSS
  • Subscribe via Email

How To Make Conferences Great

May 23rd, 2008  | 

Following is also my latest MediaPost Spin column…

How To Make Conferences Great

Industry conferences are a cornerstone of our interactive industry. They serve many purposes: idea exchange, education, soapbox, vendor bazaar, sponsorship, promotions, networking, market intelligence and revenues for the producer. Many are great, but too many are average. And with a robust interactive economy, there are more events than any industry professional could ever expect to attend in a lifetime. It’s overwhelming, and the conference calendar is getting still more crowded, with frequent overlaps!

As a regular attendee, speaker and occasional programmer and sponsor at a range of interactive marketing events, I’ve become sensitive to several facets that can make or break the conference experience. Most of these are obvious, but the obvious too often is neglected or ignored altogether.

Conference producers, take note! Here are my top ten recommendations to be great:

  1. Be authoritative. To produce an A-level conference, you need to be the highest-level authority in the subject. That means acknowledging where your subject-matter authority begins and ends, and cultivating it over the long haul. Conversations are a conference core, and meaningful ones require thought leaders to attract the right participants, engage stakeholders, guide the discussion and synthesize conclusions. Are you an authority?
  2. Define your community. Who are the core stakeholders that make up your community? Are you eyeing the strategic players, or ceding to industry tire-kickers and fly-by-night companies that probably won’t be around after recession or consolidation? The quality of everything correlates to your discipline in serving core, strategic community members - whether presenters, attendees, sponsors or partners.
  3. Halt Powerpoint abuse. I’m shocked at how many conferences will charge thousands of dollars for a ticket and then subject attendees to boring presentations made excruciating by Powerpoint abuse. A lot can be done to improve presentations, but putting severe restrictions on slide usage is top of the list. By eliminating Powerpoint crutches, presenters would be forced to inject more thought and preparation into effective presentation techniques.
  4. Enforce points of view. I’m also shocked at how many presenters and panelists show up with poorly constructed arguments - if any real point of view at all. Every single moderator, presenter and panelist should be forced to submit a one-page persuasive essay on his or her subject, with solid supporting evidence. Such an exercise would intimidate and weed out people without anything meaningful to say, and enforce more crystallized arguments and constructive discussion.
  5. Pay the presenters. OK, maybe this idea is crazy. Why would a conference producer pay presenters if there already are so many people jockeying for the spotlight? First, many of the smartest, most relevant presenters won’t show without pay, or some other significant incentive. Secondly, if presenters are what drive paying attendees, shouldn’t conferences share in the financial gain? Thirdly, paying presenters would create demand for such presenter opportunities and drive the quality of the talent pool.
  6. Showcase more new smart faces. There’s a lot of smart people that deserve repeat exposure, but too many conferences rely too much on the mainstay experts. Many conference producers can afford to do more homework to solicit new faces and compelling stories.
  7. Tap into audience wisdom. Even conferences with poor attendance typically end up gathering relatively significant numbers of smart people. Conferences should do more to harness that wisdom and redirect it back into the overall experience. A conference can attract some great presenters, but the collective wisdom of the attendees will always be far greater. Think survey research, focus groups, workshops, debate and online interaction. Eliminate “audience” status and make everyone a participant.
  8. Serve good food. Why is bad hotel food the staple of so many conferences? Dry chicken breasts. Overcooked salmon. Soggy vegetarian plates. Then there’s the self-serve box lunch with aging cold cuts on a stale bun, accompanied by a waxy apple. Considering the cost of conference tickets, there’s room for better food!
  9. Provide reliable WiFi. Most conferences have received the memo: not providing WiFi creates a tumultuous experience for busy execs who need to be on the grid. Not having WiFi also creates friction for press and bloggers filing stories. Conferences are getting better, but WiFi provisions still are not guaranteed. They should be, especially in cavernous venues where wireless broadband cards don’t work.
  10. Remember that less is more. Finally, producing more conferences isn’t necessarily better. If there’s a market for more, great! But expanding conference franchises may risk diluting core conference brands and signature events. Great care must be taken to ensure that quality and exclusivity are not jeopardized in the quest for greater volume and revenues.

Which industry conferences do you attend? And what makes or breaks the experience?

discussion by DISQUS

Add New Comment

  • Subscribe:  This Thread
  • Go to:  My Comments ·  Community Page
  • Sort thread by:

    Viewing 6 Comments

    Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.

    Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      • ^
      • v
      • Permalink
      • Admin
        • Remove Post
        • Block email
        • Block IP address
      Smoke Wallin 6 months ago 1 point

      Please login to rate.

      Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      Excellent piece! As the Chair of a number of conferences, I appreciate your many good thoughts here. I particularly concur with point #3 regarding PowerPoint abuse. This is a systemic problem with most speakers today. I do think paying for key speakers has its place in certain kinds of conferences and events, especially at the keynote or general session; however as a frequent speaker, I know having a platform upon which to present is valuable. The way we approach it at the Wine Industry Technology Symposium™ (WITS) and at Wine 2.0™is we generally do not pay, but will comp attendance fees and pick up out of town travel expenses and hotel rooms for key speakers. More important than pay in my opinion is your point #1. Being the authority or expert gathering in any industry draws the best talent to both speak and attend. Well done Max and do come back to one of our conferences soon!
      reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
      http://www.drinktechnology.com /people/8911f97aef5af328ea82d156c700e739/
      • ^
      • v
      • Parent
      • Permalink
      • Admin
        • Remove Post
        • Block username
        • Block email
        • Block IP address
      maxkalehoff 6 months ago 1 point

      Please login to rate.

      Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      Thanks, Smoke! And I hope look forward to seeing more about Wine 2.0!
      Max
      reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
      2 /people/maxkalehoff/ /people/maxkalehoff/following/ http://www.attentionmax.com 524723114 pub/0/b25/535 maxkalehoff maxkalehoff maxkalehoff
      • ^
      • v
      • Permalink
      • Admin
        • Remove Post
        • Block username
        • Block email
        • Block IP address
      tomob 5 months ago 1 point

      Please login to rate.

      Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      Hi Max:

      Interesting post - I am relatively new to the Web 2.0/social media conference circuit - and I am already tired of some of the stories. There are lots of smart people out there - and conference producers need to think long and hard about moving to Conference 2.0.

      Conference 1.0 is having people (either smart in the field OR those representing gigantic global corporations) stand up at a podium and hammer us into our seats with powerpoint.

      Conference 2.0 requires audience participation and involvement, and cracks open the podium to get some new ideas and speakers up there - it doesn't all have to be industry luminaries and pay to play does it? I think the WOMMA-U conference did something interesting with the WOM in Action program down in Miami.

      http://preview.tinyurl.com/545ved

      Regards - TO'B
      reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
      3 /people/tomob/ /people/tomob/following/ http://humanvoice.wordpress.com in/tomob
      • ^
      • v
      • Parent
      • Permalink
      • Admin
        • Remove Post
        • Block username
        • Block email
        • Block IP address
      maxkalehoff 5 months ago 1 point

      Please login to rate.

      Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      TO'B,
      Thanks for your comment. There is a school of thought called the
      "unconference". I like the idea, but too many of those have had too little
      structure. I think a great way to cultivate more meaningful conferences is
      to remove the commercial aspect. Why do you need to pay thousands of dollars
      to bring people together in a substandard venue? More on that later.
      Max
      reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
      2 /people/maxkalehoff/ /people/maxkalehoff/following/ http://www.attentionmax.com 524723114 pub/0/b25/535 maxkalehoff maxkalehoff maxkalehoff
      • ^
      • v
      • Permalink
      • Admin
        • Remove Post
        • Block email
        • Block IP address
      Amber Naslund 5 months ago 1 point

      Please login to rate.

      Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      Freaking beautiful. Seriously, I've gotten myself so amped up about many a conference, only to be brain damaged by said sandpaper poultry and mind numbing, scripted and canned powerpoint presentations. I go to a conference to be smarter, to meet other smart people (hopefully smarter than me), and nothing deflates me more quickly than realizing I've been duped. (Ok, maybe not deliberately buuuuutt...)

      I'm especially YAY about #6 and #7. There are so many smart people out there and so few speaking slots. What say we relive a bit of a discussion forum and let the ideas emerge? I mean, hey. It works for Twitter.
      reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
      http://thebrandbox.blogspot.com /people/a3803133c696060bb1e9740c73926298/
      • ^
      • v
      • Parent
      • Permalink
      • Admin
        • Remove Post
        • Block username
        • Block email
        • Block IP address
      maxkalehoff 5 months ago 1 point

      Please login to rate.

      Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

      Amber, Thanks for your note. Rubber chicken should have been at the top of
      my list.
      Max
      reply  edit  reblog  flag   record video comment
      2 /people/maxkalehoff/ /people/maxkalehoff/following/ http://www.attentionmax.com 524723114 pub/0/b25/535 maxkalehoff maxkalehoff maxkalehoff
     
    discussion by DISQUS

    Add New Comment

    Trackbacks

    (Trackback URL)

    close ()

    status via twitter

    recent comments (follow comments)

      View Profile »
      Powered by Disqus · Learn more
      close Reblog this comment
      Powered by Disqus · Learn more
      blog comments powered by Disqus
      • Popular

        • What Is Influence?
        • The Skinny On Advertising, Engagement, Privacy & Trust
        • Are You Suffering From Socialnetworkitis?
        • Email Blows Away All Other Social Networks
        • Move Over, Seth Godin, Einstein's Here
        • The Debate Continues: What Is Influence?
        • Social Media Is Lexical Deviation
        • The Future Of Technorati
        • The Biggest Opportunities For Brands To Leverage Interactive Marketing
        • Ignorant Customers Happier With Their Choices
      • Recent

        • Blogging And Community Is ‘Real’ Work
        • I’m Losing It, According To MySpace
        • My 2009 Predictions
        • Comment Of The Week: Jessica On Fighting The “Norm” of Hand-Washing
        • Marketing Leadership Is Shifting From Command-And-Control To Cultivate-And-Coach
        • SEO Spammers Are Corrupting The Social Media Commons
        • Eight Years Later: Better Today Than Ever
        • Recharging
        • The Problem With ‘Full Disclosure’ Is That It’s Not
        • B2B Marketing Is Not Dead, But The Top-Down, Marketing Silo Is Eroding
      • Editor's Picks

        • Why Passion Matters
        • The Etiquette Of Seeking Advice
        • Enemies Are Good For You
        • The Little Things Offer The Greatest Lessons And Inspiration
        • Great Marketing Comes With A Smile
        • Small Marketers Versus Big Marketers
        • There’s No Such Thing As Free!
        • Most Agencies & Publishers Fail To Offer Marketers Real Ways To Embrace Social Media
        • PR Agentry Is Broken
        • What Makes A Great Strategy Offsite? Customers
       

      Latest Twitter Update

      • Anyone have a source of data for total number of online ad impressions? Need some market sizing data for a presentation I'm completing.

      Recent Photos On Flickr

      Pete Blackshaw presenting at SEMPO NYC Meetup.My Fortune cookie from last week's takeout, and I couldn't agree more!Party supplies for Julian's 2nd birthday. Supporting Target during this economic downturn.

      Recent Bookmarks (delicious)


      ©2008 AttentionMax
      Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.